September 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Blog powered by Typepad

« The Fingerprints of Barney Frank | Main | The Wrong Word »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I think this problem is vastly understated! I have talked to execs in the banking industry who have told me that new entrants into the market are essentially waiting to see what the government will do. The supply of credit drops, yet it can't be filled until the government plays its hand. The little guy(s) who might take the place of fallen giants never get a face on the news, and can't afford to lobby anyone. The wealth that society looses from uncertain policies must be dispersed and nigh-impossible to estimate.

I myself am considering putting some plans on hold or scrapping them altogether, due to possible regulatory changes.

The end paragraph, at least for me, makes the point extremely clear. So how do we get this concept to be discussed more widely or will it remain purely academic?

May I point out that regime uncertainty and Big Players are not really separate topics? Higgs notes that the issue has been neglected in part because of "the availability of standard macroeconomic models whose variables do not include the degree of regime uncertainty and, even if one wanted to incorporate it into an existing model, the absence of any conventional quantitative index of such uncertainty." While I don't have any such index, my co-authors and I done econometric studies on the topic. In this sense we have applied relatively mainstream tools to a problem the mainstream has largely neglected.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Our Books