Alex Tabarrok has a nice post entitled "Advice for Graduate Students" that emphasizes (through the example of Steve Levitt) the value of hard work in establishing a research career in economics. As Alex highlights, it takes years to get a really good paper in shape and published. What is the longest time you have worked on a paper from start to final publication?
The first paper I wrote in graduate school was originally written in the summer of 1984, revised probably 25 or more times and was published in 1989. Another paper was thought up in 1987, written in 1992, finally published in 1997. As you write more papers, the production process can become more efficient and you can produce papers in a shorter span of time. But from the original idea through the drafts papers do not appear overnight. Scholars who write a lot of papers do so because they write everyday, day after day, for years. There is no secret formula. Hard work pays off.
Here is some of the best advice I ever received.
James Buchanan -- "Keep your ass in the chair. If you work 6:00am to 6:00pm, you will outwork all the other academics around you."
James Buchanan -- "All work is work in progress. Don't get it right, get it written."
James Buchanan -- "Writing is research."
James Buchanan -- "The best dissertation is a done dissertation."
James Buchanan --- "It takes varied reiterations to force alien concepts upon reluctant minds."
James Buchanan --- "It is not the courage of convictions that matters, but the courage to withstand the critique of your convictions that matters."
James Buchanan --- "Dare to be different."
Kenneth Boulding -- "At some point in your career you will be confronted with the following dilemma -- should you read or should you write. I chose to write."
Bob Tollison -- "Never consider a criticism as lethal, but instead as an opportunity for another line on your CV."
Don Lavoie -- "Why are you doing this? Don't ever forget your answer to that question."
Israel Kirzner -- "A scholar needs a quiet life for serious contemplation. Don't say yes to everything otherwise you will never have the quiet needed to make the contributions you are capable of."
Andrei Shleifer -- "Why be boring?"
Gary Becker (about what he learned from Milton Friedman) --- "Economics is not just a game to be played by clever people, but a discipline for thinking about the world and addressing the real-world of public policy."
The best advice I can give to students is:
"Look out the window rather than on the black board for your questions. Strive to find puzzles where it appears that history defies what logic dictates and then solve the puzzle by demonstrating with the tools of rational choice theory and institutional analysis the the defiance was only an illusion."
"Strive to become a productive input into the scholarly production process of the leading scholars in your field."
"Think like a Misesian (deductively), but write like a Hayekian (inductively). Or in other words, use praxeology to think about economics and political economy, but write up your results in the language of conjectures and refutations."
"Listen to everything that James Buchanan has to say about pursuing an academic career as an economist and political economist."
What is the best advice you have heard from your professors on how to be a productive scholar in economics?
Get one on one with a world class thinker as early as you can, find the most important and challenging problems, and hang out (or lunch) with people who are working on them. Check out every school of thought however stupid it looks at first sight. Be prepared to puch an interesting idea as far as it will go - unpack the contents and implications. Keep a journal to track the way your thinking develops, and the way particular books or associates impact, especially on the way you formulate your problems or change direction. Revisit key works every few years and see how much more you find in some of them. Get back to your earliest living teachers and tell them how much you appreciate their efforts.
Posted by: Rafe Champion | September 12, 2007 at 05:45 PM
You forgot one from Tollison, on the importance of getting things done, rather than done perfectly:
"Editors edit."
One of the key problems I see with some folks is a desire to write papers that are perfect rather than ones that are good enough to be published. Get it written, get it submitted, and worry about the finer points later.
Posted by: Steven Horwitz | September 12, 2007 at 07:40 PM
One other thing: the advice from JMB and KB about "writing is research" and write rather than read is so true. I'm finding, at the moment, with lots of time to write and writing about issues that I haven't really written on before, that the act of forcing myself to write is the way I generate new ideas and really learn what it is I'm trying to say. Writing is research is argument development.
BTW, the same is true of teaching: the best way to learn something is to have to teach it.
Posted by: Steven Horwitz | September 12, 2007 at 07:44 PM
Hamming is good on the big picture of research and also on the different types of presentation that are required - the need for journal articles to arrest the page turners, the need for conference papers to start general and work down to your technical refinements which will only interest three people in the audience, and the need to be able to stand up (trying to look confident) and give short grabs on your work or intelligent comments and questions more or less off the cuff in front of a lot of unfriendly strangers (that is, your mainstream colleagues).
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.pdf
Posted by: Rafe | September 12, 2007 at 08:31 PM
You forgot one of your own pearls of wisdom, Pete:
(1) Demonstrate that you are an effective teacher while in graduate school;
(2) Have at least one publication on your CV when hitting the job market; and
(3) Don't be a "lunch tax."
I'm pretty sure you have some evidence indicating that students who listened to this advice almost always managed to secure a tenure track slot in academia.
Posted by: Scott Beaulier | September 13, 2007 at 09:49 AM
In his autobiography, former NC Coach Dean Smith said that one of the best pieces of advice he ever received was to always keep a sport coat on the back of your door "because you never know who will stop by."
Posted by: Josh Hall | September 13, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Thanks Scott, and the record is actually 100%. But that was a big mistake to not list that on my part and it didn't come from me, but instead from the combined wisdom of Rich Fink (2/3rds of it) and Roger Garrison (1/3rd). Rich also had presentations at professional meetings as part of his formula, and Garrison didn't employ the idea of a lunch tax to discuss job market results in particular, but just life in general. Garrison's other wisdom was that the world can be divided into people who need accomodating and those who accomodate, what you have to avoid is being in situations where the number of people who need accomodating outnumber those who accomodate.
Posted by: Peter Boettke | September 13, 2007 at 10:41 AM
Pete Boettke: "Consistently apply the seat of your pants to the seat of your chair and write".
Pete Boettke: "Start with writing five pages a day, your dissertation will write itself in two years".
Pete Boettke: "One idea, one paper!!"
Pete Boettke: "Find a writing buddy in grad school so you can write papers together and motivate each other to write."
Richard Wagner: "Ideas that are not written down as a paper are like day dreams"
Posted by: triya | September 14, 2007 at 01:21 PM
Sorry for bothering; could anybody help me with the "lunch tax" idea?
What's the meaning by saying "Don't be a lunch tax" ? How does this related to discussing job market results and life?
Thanks!
Posted by: Mandy | September 25, 2007 at 04:42 PM
> What's the meaning by saying "Don't be a lunch tax" ?
I found this:
> The other factor in this equation is the "lunch tax" that
> the individual represents. The more difficult the person
> is to take as a personality, the stronger publications
> they will have to have in order to signal that they are
> worth it.
http://austrianeconomists.typepad.com/weblog/2005/08/how_to_succeed_.html
Posted by: Aaron Brown | April 30, 2008 at 02:36 PM
Garrison's other wisdom was that the world can be divided into people who need accomodating and those who accomodate, what you have to avoid is being in situations where the number of people who need accomodating outnumber those who accomodate.
Posted by: wench wear | May 29, 2010 at 01:20 PM