David L. Prychitko
Take a good look at Recovery.gov.
This 18 million dollar cite offers a goldmine of claims for those interested in rent seeking, questionable statistics, unclear sources of information, and best of all it's wrapped in an emphasis on the seen while failing to acknowledge the unseen.
Gotta admit though, the design is fabulous. Is Government IT (at least the public facing side) getting so much better?
Posted by: Contemplationist | December 03, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Do they tell you the method used to estimate the jobs created or saved beyond saying "as reported by recipients"? One thing I wonder about is whether the report given affects the chances of further money? Is the money given in stages? Other interesting questions involve the contrary-to-fact hypothetical the reporters use to imagine what would have happened without the money. Are they saying, for example, we could not have hired these people at this particular wage rate without the money? Or we could not have hired them at all? Are they saying that since they could not have hired ALL of them at a particular wage rate that the employment is totally due to the stimulus money?
I know I am being a pest for details. But I am not the one who put up the site making claims about 600,000 plus jobs saved or created.
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | December 03, 2009 at 12:37 PM
You just ruined my day.
Posted by: Josh | December 03, 2009 at 12:38 PM
"Are they saying that since they could not have hired ALL of them at a particular wage rate that the employment is totally due to the stimulus money?"
Mario, I believe this is their claim.
Posted by: Dave Prychitko | December 03, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Sort of like another IPCC ...
"a goldmine of claims for those interested in rent seeking, questionable statistics, unclear sources of information"
Posted by: Greg Ransom | December 03, 2009 at 01:17 PM
I think it provides enough data so that you can breakdown stimulus funds by congressional district (or maybe zip code). Combine that with some zip code unemployment data and you could get a pretty nice panel to test things like whether party affiliation of the area determined how much stimulus funds they received, or how senior the senator/representatives were in the area and how much stimulus the area received.
Posted by: John | December 03, 2009 at 08:39 PM
On the main Recovery.gov page, the table "Top States by Jobs Created/Saved" is my favorite: 110,185.36 jobs saved/created in California. Such precision, down to the hundredth place!
Posted by: Jeremy H. | December 03, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Serve.gov is far more heart-warming!
Posted by: doug | December 04, 2009 at 11:03 AM