Steven Horwitz
George Selgin has a review of a new book Money, Markets, and Sovereignty up at the EH.net website. It's a nice overview of some important issues surrounding money and nationalism.
« Development Links | Main | Another New Gig »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451eb0069e20120a6a921e1970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Selgin on Steil and Hinds:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
David Prychitko: Markets, Planning and Democracy: Essays After the Collapse of Socialism
David Prychitko: Marxism and Workers' Self-Management: The Essential Tension
David Prytchitko: Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, & David Prychitko : The Economic Way of Thinking (11th Edition)
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Selgin said: "That many of the world's citizens would be better off using dollars or euros than continuing to be forced to rely on their own governments' monies is certainly true"
This is really thought provoking. It had never occured to me before now, but promoting the use of stable foriegn monies could be a novel way to aid development in poor nations.
Posted by: Lee Kelly | November 05, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Lee,
Cant really say that. El Salvador and Panamá have dollar economies and they have on average higher inflation than in the U. S., up to 8% per annum in Panamá.
Posted by: Pablo | November 05, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Pablo: What, in your opinion, would the overall inflation rates in El Salvador and Panama have been, for the periods in which these countries have been dollarized, had they instead had independent fiat currencies? The question demands a counterfactual, of course. But how 'bout if we let the average inflation rate of all other Central and South American countries during the same span of years serve as our estimate. Do you still think dollarization would have been the worse choice?
Of course, w.r.t. fiat monies, "stability" is a relative notion.
Posted by: George Selgin | November 05, 2009 at 10:41 PM
I love your style. <3
Posted by: Lode Cossaer | November 06, 2009 at 02:00 PM
(And now I understand how it is possible to make comments on the wrong post. Obviously, this comment was mend for the next blogpost called 'another new gig'. :))
Posted by: Lode Cossaer | November 06, 2009 at 02:03 PM