April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Blog powered by Typepad

« The “Failed Policies of the Past” vs. the Bad Policies of the Present: Can Productivity Figures in NZ Tell Us the Truth? | Main | Public and Private Sector Disaster Relief Summarized »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451eb0069e200e55138ef9e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wal-Mart, the Coast Guard, and Hurricane Katrina:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why not simply abolish FEMA? It is not only a taxpayer boondoggle, but its very existence serves to wrongly make people think the government is on the job and therefore they don't need to do anything in the way of private charitable efforts.

Government and charity are substitutes. people won't give money to a cause when they think it is something the government does or will do, correctly or incorrectly thinking that private action is thus superfluous.

Wal-mart's greatest advantages were in having an excellent supply chain management system and in being able to offer a better response than the hollowed-out FEMA (a very low bar). I seriously doubt they want to be in the business of responding to natural disasters.

The comments to this entry are closed.